| dc.contributor |
Thornton, Edward B. |
|
| dc.contributor |
Wu, Chung-Shang |
|
| dc.contributor |
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) |
|
| dc.contributor |
Oceanography |
|
| dc.creator |
Koehler, Richard Bruce |
|
| dc.date |
September 1988 |
|
| dc.date |
2012-11-27T18:05:51Z |
|
| dc.date |
2012-11-27T18:05:51Z |
|
| dc.date |
1988-09 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-19T07:47:42Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2022-05-19T07:47:42Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/22893 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/100209 |
|
| dc.description |
An implicit finite difference model for predicting flood routing is applied to
the lower Columbia River, where tidal forcing causes flow reversals interacting
with upstream dam flow during small river flow periods. The model is one-dimensional,
unsteady, including lateral inflow and variable bed friction for
different channel sections. A comparison of stages at six stations was made for a
sensitivity analysis. The analysis used a total of 2209 hours of simulated river
stages.
Downstream boundary changes of ±0.5 feet and ±2.0 feet were made to the
Astoria tide stages. Model simulations showed that 70% of the tide difference
appears at Vancouver and Portland, 80% at St. Helens, 85% at Longview, 93% at
Wauna and 95% at Skamokawa. Varying the upstream boundary condition
(Bonneville Dam discharges) by ±10% and ±25% were markedly different from
the downstream boundary changes. Upstream, where the tide influence is weakest,
the tidal cycle is more likely to be "washed out" by the higher flows of the
Columbia. Also these changes fluctuated with the tide cycle. Downstream stations
did not show such differences because of the larger cross section areas of the
Columbia River nearer the mouth and the proximity to the downstream boundary
condition.
The river system was calibrated in a downstream to upstream direction and
used a total of 606 hours of observed river stages. Three periods with distinct river
flow conditions were used in the calibration. Regression analyses of the computed
residual values for each of the stations gave correlation coefficients (r²) less than
0.360. However, cross correlations between residual and computed stages showed
that the two series were highly sinusoidally correlated for all stations. A spectral
estimation of the residuals exhibited very strong peaks at frequencies of 0.081 hr ¹
(12.3 hrs), 0.042 hr¹ (24.0 hrs) and subsequent harmonics of these frequencies.
The residual components are strongly associated with the tidal cycle. |
|
| dc.description |
http://archive.org/details/analysisofnumeri00koeh |
|
| dc.description |
Lieutenant, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration |
|
| dc.description |
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. |
|
| dc.format |
73 p. |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
en_US |
|
| dc.rights |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. |
|
| dc.subject |
implicit finite difference model |
|
| dc.subject |
Columbia-Willamette River stage simulations |
|
| dc.subject |
stage error analysis |
|
| dc.subject |
sensitivity analysis |
|
| dc.title |
An analysis of a numerical tidal model applied to the Columbia River. |
|
| dc.type |
Thesis |
|