| dc.creator |
Wood, Derrick E |
|
| dc.creator |
Lin, Henry |
|
| dc.creator |
Levy-Moonshine, Ami |
|
| dc.creator |
Swaminathan, Rajiswari |
|
| dc.creator |
Chang, Yi-Chien |
|
| dc.creator |
Anton, Brian P |
|
| dc.creator |
Osmani, Lais |
|
| dc.creator |
Steffen, Martin |
|
| dc.creator |
Kasif, Simon |
|
| dc.creator |
Salzberg, Steven L |
|
| dc.date |
2021-09-28T18:41:24Z |
|
| dc.date |
2021-09-28T18:41:24Z |
|
| dc.date |
2012-10-30 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-20T08:38:52Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2022-05-20T08:38:52Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://doi.org/10.13016/i3dm-vkvw |
|
| dc.identifier |
Wood, D.E., Lin, H., Levy-Moonshine, A. et al. Thousands of missed genes found in bacterial genomes and their analysis with COMBREX. Biol Direct 7, 37 (2012). |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/1903/28038 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/117665 |
|
| dc.description |
The dramatic reduction in the cost of sequencing has allowed many researchers to join in the effort of sequencing and annotating prokaryotic genomes. Annotation methods vary considerably and may fail to identify some genes. Here we draw attention to a large number of likely genes missing from annotations using common tools such as Glimmer and BLAST. By analyzing 1,474 prokaryotic genome annotations in GenBank, we identify 13,602 likely missed genes that are homologs to non-hypothetical proteins, and 11,792 likely missed genes that are homologs only to hypothetical proteins, yet have supporting evidence of their protein-coding nature from COMBREX, a newly created gene function database. We also estimate the likelihood that each potential missing gene found is a genuine protein-coding gene using COMBREX. Our analysis of the causes of missed genes suggests that larger annotation centers tend to produce annotations with fewer missed genes than smaller centers, and many of the missed genes are short genes <300 bp. Over 1,000 of the likely missed genes could be associated with phenotype information available in COMBREX. 359 of these genes, found in pathogenic organisms, may be potential targets for pharmaceutical research. The newly identified genes are available on COMBREX’s website. |
|
| dc.description |
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-37 |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
en_US |
|
| dc.publisher |
Springer Nature |
|
| dc.relation |
College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences |
|
| dc.relation |
Computer Science |
|
| dc.relation |
Digital Repository at the University of Maryland |
|
| dc.relation |
University of Maryland (College Park, MD) |
|
| dc.subject |
Genome Annotation |
|
| dc.subject |
Annotate Gene |
|
| dc.subject |
Prokaryotic Genome |
|
| dc.subject |
True Gene |
|
| dc.subject |
Significant Sequence Similarity |
|
| dc.title |
Thousands of missed genes found in bacterial genomes and their analysis with COMBREX |
|
| dc.type |
Article |
|