Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Measuring and comparing the reliability of the structured walkthrough evaluation method with novices and experts

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bailey, C
dc.creator Pearson, E
dc.creator Gkatzidou, V
dc.date 2015-02-05T13:52:27Z
dc.date 2014
dc.date 2015-02-05T13:52:27Z
dc.date 2014
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-25T14:53:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-25T14:53:51Z
dc.identifier W4A 2014 - 11th Web for All Conference, 2014
dc.identifier http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2596695.2596696
dc.identifier http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10127
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596696
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/172710
dc.description Effective evaluation of websites for accessibility remains problematic. Automated evaluation tools still require a significant manual element. There is also a significant expertise and evaluator effect. The Structured Walkthrough method is the translation of a manual, expert accessibility evaluation process adapted for use by novices. The method is embedded in the Accessibility Evaluation Assistant (AEA), a web accessibility knowledge management tool. Previous trials examined the pedagogical potential of the tool when incorporated into an undergraduate computing curriculum. The results of the evaluations carried out by novices yielded promising, consistent levels of validity and reliability. This paper presents the results of an empirical study that compares the reliability of accessibility evaluations produced by two groups (novices and experts). The main results of this study indicate that overall reliability of expert evaluations was 76% compared to 65% for evaluations produced by novices. The potential of the Structured Walkthrough method as a useful and viable tool for expert evaluators is also examined. Copyright 2014 ACM.
dc.language eng
dc.language en
dc.publisher Association for Computing Machinery
dc.relation W4A 2014 - 11th Web for All Conference
dc.relation W4A 2014 - 11th Web for All Conference
dc.subject Web accessibility evaluation
dc.subject Web accessibility guidelines
dc.title Measuring and comparing the reliability of the structured walkthrough evaluation method with novices and experts
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Fulltext.pdf 385.6Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse