Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Use and usability of GP online services: a mixed-methods sequential study, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites in Devon and Cornwall, England

Show simple item record

dc.creator Jones, RB
dc.creator Tredinnick-Rowe, J
dc.creator Baines, R
dc.creator Maramba, IDC
dc.creator Chatterjee, A
dc.date 2022-03-11T14:00:27Z
dc.date 2022-03-11T14:00:27Z
dc.date 2022-03-07
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-26T21:09:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-26T21:09:51Z
dc.identifier 2044-6055
dc.identifier e058247
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18934
dc.identifier 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058247
dc.identifier 2044-6055
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/228986
dc.description <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>We explored use and usability of general practitioner (GP) online services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Devon and Cornwall, England.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Mixed-methods sequential study based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>First, we interviewed 32 staff and 18 patients from seven practices in June 2018. Second, we used routinely collected consultation meta-data and, third, patient feedback data for all practices using eConsult from June 2018 to March 2021. Lastly, we examined GP websites’ usability in January 2020 and September 2021.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Interviews suggested practices infrequently involved patients in eConsult implementation. Some patients ‘gamed’ the system to achieve what they wanted. Usage data showed a major increase in eConsult resulting from COVID-19. Women used eConsult twice as much as men. Older had similar eConsult consultation rates to younger patients. Patient feedback forms were completed for fewer than 3% of consultations. Patients were mostly satisfied with eConsult but some had concerns about its length and repetitiveness, lack of continuity over time and between eConsult and medical records. We did not find clear evidence that patients’ suggested improvements were acted on. Finally, few GP websites met accessibility guidelines and may hinder access to online national services such as eConsult.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Given that, face to face, older people consult more, usage data suggest that older people have reduced online access. That the female-to-male ratio of eConsult use use was even greater than ‘traditional’ face-to-face ratio was unexpected and needs further research. Although eConsult collects and uses routine patient feedback to improve the system, more open systems for patient feedback, such as Care Opinion, may be more effective in helping online systems evolve. Lastly, we question the need for GP websites and suggest that national or regional services are better placed to maintain accessible services.</jats:p></jats:sec>
dc.language en
dc.language en
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation ISSN:2044-6055
dc.relation E-ISSN:2044-6055
dc.rights 2022-03-12
dc.rights Not known
dc.title Use and usability of GP online services: a mixed-methods sequential study, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites in Devon and Cornwall, England
dc.type Journal Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
e058247.full.pdf 655.9Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse