Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

How do we engage people in testing for COVID-19? A rapid qualitative evaluation of a testing programme in schools, GP surgeries and a university

Show simple item record

dc.creator Watson, D
dc.creator Baralle, NL
dc.creator Alagil, J
dc.creator Anil, K
dc.creator Ciccognani, S
dc.creator Dewar-Haggart, R
dc.creator Fearn, S
dc.creator Groot, J
dc.creator Knowles, K
dc.creator Meagher, C
dc.creator McGrath, C
dc.creator Muir, S
dc.creator Musgrove, J
dc.creator Glyn-Owen, K
dc.creator Woods-Townsend, K
dc.creator Mortimore, A
dc.creator Roderick, P
dc.creator Baird, J
dc.creator Inskip, H
dc.creator Godfrey, K
dc.creator Barker, M
dc.date 2022-03-11T14:18:28Z
dc.date 2022-02-14
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-26T21:09:54Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-26T21:09:54Z
dc.identifier 1471-2458
dc.identifier 305
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18939
dc.identifier 10.1186/s12889-022-12657-4
dc.identifier 1471-2458
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/228994
dc.description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) emphasises the need for high levels of engagement with communities and individuals to ensure the effectiveness of any COVID-19 testing programme. A novel pilot health surveillance programme to assess the feasibility of weekly community RT-LAMP (Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification) testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus using saliva samples collected at home was developed and piloted by the University of Southampton and Southampton City Council.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Rapid qualitative evaluation was conducted to explore experiences of those who took part in the programme, of those who declined and of those in the educational and healthcare organisations involved in the pilot testing who were responsible for roll-out. This included 77 interviews and 20 focus groups with 223 staff, students, pupils and household members from four schools, one university, and one community healthcare NHS trust. The insights generated and informed the design and modification of the Southampton COVID-19 Saliva Testing Programme and the next phase of community-testing.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Discussions revealed that high levels of communication, trust and convenience were necessary to ensure people’s engagement with the programme. Participants felt reassured by and pride in taking part in this novel programme. They suggested modifications to reduce the programme’s environmental impact and overcome cultural barriers to participation.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Participants’ and stakeholders’ motivations, challenges and concerns need to be understood and these insights used to modify the programme in a continuous, real-time process to ensure and sustain engagement with testing over the extended period necessary. Community leaders and stakeholder organisations should be involved throughout programme development and implementation to optimise engagement.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
dc.language en
dc.language en
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation ISSN:1471-2458
dc.relation E-ISSN:1471-2458
dc.rights 2022-03-12
dc.rights Not known
dc.title How do we engage people in testing for COVID-19? A rapid qualitative evaluation of a testing programme in schools, GP surgeries and a university
dc.type Journal Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
s12889-022-12657-4.pdf 1.044Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse