Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time

Show simple item record

dc.creator Linton, M-J
dc.creator Dieppe, P
dc.creator Medina-Lara, A
dc.date 2018-10-05T09:18:36Z
dc.date 2016-07-07
dc.date 2018-10-05T09:18:36Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-27T00:52:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-27T00:52:50Z
dc.identifier Vol. 6 (7), article e010641
dc.identifier 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10871/34199
dc.identifier BMJ Open
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/241357
dc.description This is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.
dc.description OBJECTIVE: Investigators within many disciplines are using measures of well-being, but it is not always clear what they are measuring, or which instruments may best meet their objectives. The aims of this review were to: systematically identify well-being instruments, explore the variety of well-being dimensions within instruments and describe how the production of instruments has developed over time. DESIGN: Systematic searches, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from 1993 to 2014 complemented by web searches and expert consultations through 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Instruments were selected for review if they were designed for adults (≥18 years old), generic (ie, non-disease or context specific) and available in an English version. RESULTS: A total of 99 measures of well-being were included, and 196 dimensions of well-being were identified within them. Dimensions clustered around 6 key thematic domains: mental well-being, social well-being, physical well-being, spiritual well-being, activities and functioning, and personal circumstances. Authors were rarely explicit about how existing theories had influenced the design of their tools; however, the 2 most referenced theories were Diener's model of subjective well-being and the WHO definition of health. The period between 1990 and 1999 produced the greatest number of newly developed well-being instruments (n=27). An illustration of the dimensions identified and the instruments that measure them is provided within a thematic framework of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides researchers with an organised toolkit of instruments, dimensions and an accompanying glossary. The striking variability between instruments supports the need to pay close attention to what is being assessed under the umbrella of 'well-being' measurement.
dc.description This research was supported by a University of Exeter Medical School PhD Studentship.
dc.language en
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388349
dc.rights This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject Adults
dc.subject Generic
dc.subject Measures
dc.subject Quality of life
dc.subject Well-being
dc.subject Activities of Daily Living
dc.subject Health Status
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Mental Health
dc.subject Self Report
dc.subject Spirituality
dc.subject Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.title Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Review of 99 se ... developments over time.pdf 2.316Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse