Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Citizens and Service Delivery : Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in the Human Development Sectors

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ringold, Dena
dc.creator Holla, Alaka
dc.creator Koziol, Margaret
dc.creator Srinivasan, Santhosh
dc.date 2012-03-19T09:05:10Z
dc.date 2012-03-19T09:05:10Z
dc.date 2012
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-17T20:35:29Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-17T20:35:29Z
dc.identifier http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000386194_20111124015750
dc.identifier 978-0-8213-8980-5
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2377
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/242752
dc.description Efforts by governments, donors, and civil society alike to improve governance, accountability, and development results on the ground have heightened attention to the idea that citizens can contribute to better public services by holding their policy makers, providers, and program managers accountable. While the use of social accountability to improve services in low- and middle-income countries is not new, the topic has gained currency in recent years. This book looks at how this works in practice. It aims to learn from the experiences gained from the implementation of World Bank projects and from the small, but growing, set of impact evaluations. The review is a first step to identify lessons, knowledge gaps, and questions for further research that can improve the use of these tools in government policies and through programs supported by civil society and donors, including the World Bank. The book documents a diverse and exciting set of cases the rapid adoption of access-to-information laws, the use of public expenditure tracking surveys by civil society organizations to 'follow the money' from central government budgets to schools and health clinics, and the incorporation of grievance redress mechanisms into the design of conditional cash transfer programs. Many of the examples discussed here are new initiatives, and some are being evaluated now. Much will be gained from more evaluation and the sharing of experiences across countries developed and developing alike.
dc.language English
dc.publisher World Bank
dc.relation Direction in Development ; human development
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo
dc.rights World Bank
dc.subject ABUSE
dc.subject ACCESS TO INFORMATION
dc.subject ACCESSIBILITY
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
dc.subject ACCOUNTABILITY RELATIONSHIPS
dc.subject ANTICORRUPTION
dc.subject ANTICORRUPTION BUREAU
dc.subject AUDITING
dc.subject BANKS
dc.subject BASIC NEEDS
dc.subject BASIC SERVICES
dc.subject BENEFICIARIES
dc.subject BRIBE
dc.subject BUDGET INFORMATION
dc.subject BUDGET LITERACY
dc.subject BUDGET PLANNING
dc.subject BUREAUCRACY
dc.subject CITIZEN
dc.subject CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
dc.subject CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
dc.subject CITIZENS
dc.subject CIVIL SERVANTS
dc.subject CIVIL SERVICE
dc.subject CIVIL SOCIETY
dc.subject CIVIL SOCIETY ACTORS
dc.subject CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION
dc.subject CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject CLINICS
dc.subject COLLECTIVE ACTION
dc.subject COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
dc.subject COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject COMMUNITY MEMBERS
dc.subject COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION
dc.subject COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
dc.subject COMMUNITY SCORECARD
dc.subject COMMUNITY SCORECARDS
dc.subject COMPLAINT
dc.subject COMPLAINTS
dc.subject CONSUMERS
dc.subject CORRUPT
dc.subject CORRUPT POLITICIANS
dc.subject CORRUPTION
dc.subject COURT SYSTEM
dc.subject CREDIBILITY
dc.subject DATA COLLECTION
dc.subject DECISION MAKING
dc.subject DELIVERY OF SERVICES
dc.subject DEMOCRACIES
dc.subject E-MAIL
dc.subject ECONOMIC POLICY
dc.subject EDUCATED CITIZENS
dc.subject EDUCATION SECTOR
dc.subject EDUCATION SERVICE DELIVERY
dc.subject ELECTIONS
dc.subject EMBEZZLEMENT
dc.subject FACILITATORS
dc.subject FATIGUE
dc.subject FEASIBILITY
dc.subject FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject FIGURES
dc.subject FINANCIAL CRISES
dc.subject FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
dc.subject FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY
dc.subject FOCUS GROUP
dc.subject FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS
dc.subject FOCUS GROUPS
dc.subject FRAUD
dc.subject GOOD GOVERNANCE
dc.subject GOVERNANCE DIMENSION
dc.subject GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY
dc.subject GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
dc.subject GOVERNMENT MINISTRY
dc.subject GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
dc.subject HEALTH CARE
dc.subject HEALTH PROMOTION
dc.subject HEALTH SERVICES
dc.subject HOSPITALS
dc.subject HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject HUMAN RESOURCE
dc.subject IMMUNIZATION
dc.subject INCOME
dc.subject INCOME DISTRIBUTION
dc.subject INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS
dc.subject INFORMATION REQUESTS
dc.subject INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
dc.subject INITIATIVE
dc.subject INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
dc.subject INTEGRITY
dc.subject INTERMEDIARIES
dc.subject INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject INTERVENTION
dc.subject INTERVIEWS
dc.subject INVESTIGATIONS
dc.subject JUDICIAL REVIEW
dc.subject LAWS
dc.subject LEADERSHIP
dc.subject LEGAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
dc.subject LEGAL REDRESS
dc.subject LIVING STANDARDS
dc.subject LOCAL AUTHORITIES
dc.subject LOCAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNANCE
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject MARKETING
dc.subject MASS MEDIA
dc.subject MEDICAL TREATMENT
dc.subject MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject NATIONAL LAWS
dc.subject NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject NUTRITION
dc.subject PARLIAMENT
dc.subject PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING
dc.subject PATIENT
dc.subject PATIENTS
dc.subject PERFORMANCE MONITORING
dc.subject PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
dc.subject PERSONALITY
dc.subject POLICY FRAMEWORK
dc.subject POLITICAL ECONOMY
dc.subject PRIVATE SCHOOLS
dc.subject PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject PROCUREMENT
dc.subject PROJECT DESIGN
dc.subject PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
dc.subject PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subject PUBLIC FUNDS
dc.subject PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.subject PUBLIC INFORMATION
dc.subject PUBLIC OFFICIALS
dc.subject PUBLIC OPINION
dc.subject PUBLIC POLICY
dc.subject PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
dc.subject RECONSTRUCTION
dc.subject REFUGEES
dc.subject RIGHT TO INFORMATION
dc.subject SANCTIONS
dc.subject SECURE ACCESS
dc.subject SERVICE DELIVERY
dc.subject SERVICE PROVIDERS
dc.subject SERVICE PROVISION
dc.subject SERVICE STANDARDS
dc.subject SERVICES TO CITIZENS
dc.subject SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
dc.subject SOCIAL ACTION
dc.subject SOCIAL AUDIT
dc.subject SOCIAL AUDITS
dc.subject SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject SOCIAL PROTECTION
dc.subject SOCIAL SERVICE
dc.subject SOCIAL SERVICES
dc.subject SOCIAL WORKERS
dc.subject STAKEHOLDERS
dc.subject STANDARDS OF SERVICE
dc.subject STATE GOVERNMENTS
dc.subject TEXT MESSAGING
dc.subject TRANSPARENCY
dc.subject VACCINATION
dc.subject VILLAGE
dc.subject VILLAGE MEETINGS
dc.subject VILLAGES
dc.subject WEAK ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject YOUTH
dc.subject YOUTH EMPOWERMENT
dc.title Citizens and Service Delivery : Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in the Human Development Sectors
dc.type Publications & Research :: Publication
dc.type Publications & Research :: Publication


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
657450PUB0EPI1065724B09780821389805.pdf 2.206Mb application/pdf View/Open
657450PUB0EPI1065724B09780821389805.txt 345.4Kb text/plain View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse