dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:12:28Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:12:28Z |
|
dc.date |
2011-01-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:41:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:41:02Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20110420235739 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2745 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243113 |
|
dc.description |
India's surge in growth and rapid
expansion in public spending in the past decade has created
new possibilities for its social protection system. The
growing importance of social protection (SP) is reflected in
the Government of India (GoI) common minimum program and
eleventh five year plan which commit to institutionalization
of programs as legal rights (as in the case of public works,
through the national rural employment guarantee act),
continued up-scaling of interventions (e.g., social pensions
and midday meals), and proposals to expand new types of SP
interventions to the large unorganized sector (e.g., social
security). The report draws on existing and new data
sources,. including analysis of: (i) administrative data;
(ii) several rounds of the National Sample Survey (NSS)
data; (iii) a social protection survey (SPS) undertaken for
this report in 2006 in rural areas of Orissa, Madhya
Pradesh, and Karnataka; (iv) dedicated surveys on social
pensions in Karnataka (KSPS) and Rajasthan (RSPS) in 2005
and 2006 respectively; and (v) a living standards survey
conducted in Jharkhand in 2005 (JLSS). In addition, the
report incorporates a rich body of secondary sources on SP
program performance and impact by national researchers and
government agencies. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY OF SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
dc.subject |
AGENCY EMPLOYEES |
|
dc.subject |
AGRICULTURAL WAGES |
|
dc.subject |
ALLOCATION |
|
dc.subject |
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
ANTI-POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ARID TROPICS |
|
dc.subject |
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
AUDITOR GENERAL |
|
dc.subject |
BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
BENEFICIARIES |
|
dc.subject |
BENEFICIARY |
|
dc.subject |
BLOCK GRANT |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET DATA |
|
dc.subject |
CASH BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
CASH TRANSFER |
|
dc.subject |
CASH TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CHRONIC POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
CHRONICALLY POOR |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY ACTION |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
CONDITIONAL CASH |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMPTION QUINTILES |
|
dc.subject |
COPING STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
COST EFFECTIVENESS |
|
dc.subject |
COVARIATE SHOCKS |
|
dc.subject |
CREDIT SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION OF SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
DIRECT TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
DISABILITY PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL OUTCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIES OF SCALE |
|
dc.subject |
EFFICIENCY DIVIDENDS |
|
dc.subject |
EFFICIENCY GAINS |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT GENERATION |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ENTITLEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
EPIDEMICS |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD COUPON |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD COUPONS |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD SECURITY |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD SHORTAGES |
|
dc.subject |
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT |
|
dc.subject |
GROWTH MODEL |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH PROBLEMS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD INCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN CAPITAL |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME DISTRIBUTION |
|
dc.subject |
INEQUALITY |
|
dc.subject |
INFORMAL COPING MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
LANDLESS |
|
dc.subject |
LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
LEAKAGE OF SUBSIDIES |
|
dc.subject |
LIFE INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
LINES OF ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
LIVELIHOOD OPPORTUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT |
|
dc.subject |
LIVING STANDARDS |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET FAILURES |
|
dc.subject |
MEANS TEST |
|
dc.subject |
MEANS TESTING |
|
dc.subject |
MICRO-FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MICRO-INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MINIMUM WAGE |
|
dc.subject |
MITIGATION STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
NATURAL DISASTERS |
|
dc.subject |
NUTRITION |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PARTICIPATORY METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
PENSION FUND |
|
dc.subject |
PENSION SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION |
|
dc.subject |
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
PIECE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY FORMULATION |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICIANS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR |
|
dc.subject |
POOR AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR HOUSEHOLD |
|
dc.subject |
POOR HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR PEOPLE |
|
dc.subject |
POOR RURAL HOUSEHOLD |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY ASSESSMENT |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY ESTIMATES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY GAP |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY GAP INDEX |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY INCIDENCE |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LEVELS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LINE |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LINES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY MAPS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY RATE |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY RATES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE MARKET |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM DESIGN |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM MIX |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC INTERVENTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PROVISION |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC WORKS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM AGENDA |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM PROCESS |
|
dc.subject |
REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT |
|
dc.subject |
RIGHT TO EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
RISK COPING |
|
dc.subject |
RISK MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RISK MITIGATION |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL COUNTERPARTS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL DISTRICTS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL LIVELIHOODS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL POVERTY LINE |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL POVERTY RATES |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NETS |
|
dc.subject |
SAVINGS |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOL FEEDING |
|
dc.subject |
SELF-EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
dc.subject |
SHOCK |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROTECTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL RISK |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECURITY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE |
|
dc.subject |
SUBSISTENCE |
|
dc.subject |
TARGETING |
|
dc.subject |
TARGETING MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
TRADE UNION |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPARENCY |
|
dc.subject |
UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION |
|
dc.subject |
VILLAGE LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
VULNERABLE GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
WAGE EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
WELFARE FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
WORK PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
WORKFARE |
|
dc.subject |
WORKS PROGRAM |
|
dc.title |
Social Protection for a Changing India : Main Report |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Social Protection Study |
|
dc.coverage |
South Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
South Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
India |
|