dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:12:30Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:12:30Z |
|
dc.date |
2011-01-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:41:03Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:41:03Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20110420235516 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2746 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243114 |
|
dc.description |
India's surge in growth and rapid
expansion in public spending in the past decade has created
new possibilities for its social protection system. The
growing importance of social protection (SP) is reflected in
the Government of India (GoI) common minimum program and
eleventh five year plan which commit to institutionalization
of programs as legal rights (as in the case of public works,
through the national rural employment guarantee act),
continued up-scaling of interventions (e.g., social pensions
and midday meals), and proposals to expand new types of SP
interventions to the large unorganized sector (e.g., social
security). The report draws on existing and new data
sources,. including analysis of: (i) administrative data;
(ii) several rounds of the National Sample Survey (NSS)
data; (iii) a social protection survey (SPS) undertaken for
this report in 2006 in rural areas of Orissa, Madhya
Pradesh, and Karnataka; (iv) dedicated surveys on social
pensions in Karnataka (KSPS) and Rajasthan (RSPS) in 2005
and 2006 respectively; and (v) a living standards survey
conducted in Jharkhand in 2005 (JLSS). In addition, the
report incorporates a rich body of secondary sources on SP
program performance and impact by national researchers and
government agencies. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
AGENCY EMPLOYEES |
|
dc.subject |
ALLOCATION |
|
dc.subject |
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
ANTI-POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ARID TROPICS |
|
dc.subject |
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
AUDITOR GENERAL |
|
dc.subject |
BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
BENEFICIARIES |
|
dc.subject |
BENEFICIARY |
|
dc.subject |
BLOCK GRANT |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET DATA |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET DOCUMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
CASH BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
CASH TRANSFER |
|
dc.subject |
CASH TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CHRONIC POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
CHRONICALLY POOR |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY ACTION |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
CONDITIONAL CASH |
|
dc.subject |
COST EFFECTIVENESS |
|
dc.subject |
CREDIT SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION OF SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DISABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
DISSEMINATION |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIES OF SCALE |
|
dc.subject |
EFFICIENCY DIVIDENDS |
|
dc.subject |
EFFICIENCY GAINS |
|
dc.subject |
ELDERLY |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
ENTITLEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
FLEXIBILITY |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD COUPONS |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD DEFICIT |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD SECURITY |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD SHORTAGES |
|
dc.subject |
GEOGRAPHIC TARGETING |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES |
|
dc.subject |
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT |
|
dc.subject |
GROWTH MODEL |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD ASSETS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING SUBSIDIES |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN CAPITAL |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
INEQUALITY |
|
dc.subject |
INFORMATION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
LABOR FORCE |
|
dc.subject |
LABOR MARKET |
|
dc.subject |
LANDLESS |
|
dc.subject |
LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
LEAKAGE OF SUBSIDIES |
|
dc.subject |
LEARNING |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL RIGHTS |
|
dc.subject |
LIFE INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
LINES OF ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
LIVELIHOOD |
|
dc.subject |
LIVELIHOOD OPPORTUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT |
|
dc.subject |
LIVING STANDARDS |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET FAILURES |
|
dc.subject |
MEANS TEST |
|
dc.subject |
MEANS TESTING |
|
dc.subject |
MICRO-FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MICRO-INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MINIMUM WAGE |
|
dc.subject |
MINISTRY OF LABOUR |
|
dc.subject |
MITIGATION STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
MODERNIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL COVERAGE |
|
dc.subject |
NATURAL DEATH |
|
dc.subject |
NGO |
|
dc.subject |
NUTRITION |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PENSION FUND |
|
dc.subject |
PENSION SCHEME |
|
dc.subject |
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION |
|
dc.subject |
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
PIECE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY FORMULATION |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY MAKERS |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICIANS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR |
|
dc.subject |
POOR AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR HOUSEHOLD |
|
dc.subject |
POOR HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR PEOPLE |
|
dc.subject |
POOR RURAL HOUSEHOLD |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY ESTIMATES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LEVELS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LINE |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY MAPS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY OUTCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY RATES |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION OUTCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
PREVENTION STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE MARKET |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM DESIGN |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM FINANCING |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM MIX |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRAM PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRESS |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
PROTECTION SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC INTERVENTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PROVISION |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC WORKS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM AGENDA |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM PROCESS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM STRATEGY |
|
dc.subject |
RESPECT |
|
dc.subject |
RIGHT TO EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
RISK COPING |
|
dc.subject |
RISK MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RISK MITIGATION |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL COUNTERPARTS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL DISTRICTS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL LIVELIHOODS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL POVERTY LINE |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NET TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NETS |
|
dc.subject |
SAVINGS |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOL AGE |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOL FEEDING |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
dc.subject |
SHG |
|
dc.subject |
SIGNIFICANT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
SLUM DWELLERS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL AUDITS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROTECTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL RISK |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECURITY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE |
|
dc.subject |
TARGETING |
|
dc.subject |
TARGETING MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
TRADE UNION |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPARENCY |
|
dc.subject |
UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
URBANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
VULNERABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
VULNERABLE GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
WELFARE FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
WORK PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
WORKFARE |
|
dc.subject |
WORKS PROGRAM |
|
dc.title |
Social Protection for a Changing India : Executive Summary |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Poverty Study |
|
dc.coverage |
South Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
South Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
India |
|