dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:13:02Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:13:02Z |
|
dc.date |
2011-04-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:41:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:41:27Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000020953_20110803092804 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2768 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243137 |
|
dc.description |
The objective of this study on the
Development of 13 Mozambican Municipalities in Central and
Northern Mozambique is to assess the impact that the 2008
reforms on own-source revenues is having on the municipal
revenue potential. To do so, it calculates the revenue
potential of four fiscal and three non-fiscal revenue
sources. The analysis shows that there is substantial
untapped revenue potential at the municipal level, with
estimates indicating that -in the case of the most buoyant
local revenue sources- municipalities are only collecting
about half of the revenue potential. In the worst cases,
municipalities are collecting far less than 10 percent of
the total revenue potential of a local revenue source. The
fact that a revenue gaps exists is not only an indication of
weak municipal performance. Municipalities have relatively
recently been created and it takes time, capacity, and
effort, to consolidate their revenue functions. Tax
administration is overall still weak and a series of vacuums
exist on the municipal fiscal legislation. The analysis
reveals that the current revenue instruments at the disposal
of municipalities are generally appropriate municipal
revenue instruments, so that efforts at the national and
municipal levels should be made to build the capacity of the
local tax administration to collect these revenues. The
report provides specific suggestions on ways to strengthen
the revenue collection for the main municipal revenue
instruments. However, in addition to increasing municipal
tax effort, the expenditure needs of municipalities are so
demanding that additional intergovernmental transfers and
tax sharing arrangements should also be considered as a
building block of municipal finances in Mozambique. The
results of this study aim to become part of the ongoing
dialogue with the municipalities and national tax
authorities to expand the understanding of municipal
revenues in Mozambique on the basis of more sound empirical
evidence. The scope of this analysis was limited to a sample
of six municipalities. In-depth case studies were prepared
for each of these municipalities, upon which the current
Summary Report is based. The six case municipalities
include: Beira, Cuamba, Marromeu, Nacala, Ribaue, and
Vilankulo. To bring the Summary Report and the six municipal
cases together in the most effective way, the current report
follows the same structure as each of the municipal cases.
The diagnosis of the current situation is presented in
Section 2, followed by a discussion on the estimation of
municipal revenue potential in Section 3. Proposals and
recommendations regarding the strengthening of municipal
revenue collection are presented in Section 4. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTING |
|
dc.subject |
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
ASSET MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
AUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
AUTONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
BANK ACCOUNT |
|
dc.subject |
BANK ACCOUNTS |
|
dc.subject |
BASIC EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
BETTERMENT LEVIES |
|
dc.subject |
CADASTRE |
|
dc.subject |
CADASTRES |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL INVESTMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL AUTHORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
CITY COUNCIL |
|
dc.subject |
COMMERCIAL BANK |
|
dc.subject |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT |
|
dc.subject |
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
|
dc.subject |
COMPARATIVE STATISTICS |
|
dc.subject |
COMPENSATION FUND |
|
dc.subject |
COMPETITIVE BIDDING |
|
dc.subject |
COMPLIANCE COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMPTION TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
DECONCENTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DEVOLUTION |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRICT |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRICT-LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
DOUBLE TAX |
|
dc.subject |
DOUBLE TAXATION |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC TRANSACTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
EXCHANGE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE DECISIONS |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE NEEDS |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCES |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL AUTONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL LEGISLATION |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL SPACE |
|
dc.subject |
GARBAGE COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
HEAD TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING |
|
dc.subject |
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
INFLATION |
|
dc.subject |
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
INSTRUMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER |
|
dc.subject |
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
INVESTING |
|
dc.subject |
INVESTMENT FUND |
|
dc.subject |
ISSUANCE |
|
dc.subject |
LAND SPECULATION |
|
dc.subject |
LAND USE |
|
dc.subject |
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
LEVY |
|
dc.subject |
LICENSES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL BUSINESS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL FEES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL OFFICIALS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET PRICE |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET VALUE |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET VALUES |
|
dc.subject |
MATCHING GRANTS |
|
dc.subject |
MAYORS |
|
dc.subject |
MINISTRY OF FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MORTGAGE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL COUNCILS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL LAW |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL TAXATION |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPALITY |
|
dc.subject |
NATURAL RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
NET REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
NOTARY |
|
dc.subject |
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
dc.subject |
OWN SOURCE REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DECISIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY MAKERS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL COMPETITION |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL LEADERS |
|
dc.subject |
PROPERTY TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
PROPERTY TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
PROVINCE |
|
dc.subject |
PROVINCIAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
PROVISIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC ENTITIES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC MARKETS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
REGISTRATION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE ASSIGNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE BASE |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE CATEGORY |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE COLLECTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE ENHANCEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE ESTIMATES |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE GAPS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE NEEDS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE PATTERNS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE SHARING |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE SOURCE |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE SOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE STREAMS |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE STRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE YIELD |
|
dc.subject |
ROADS |
|
dc.subject |
SMALL MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE |
|
dc.subject |
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SUBNATIONAL |
|
dc.subject |
TAX |
|
dc.subject |
TAX ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
TAX AUTHORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX AUTHORITY |
|
dc.subject |
TAX BASE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX BASES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX BURDEN |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COLLECTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COLLECTORS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COMPETITION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COST |
|
dc.subject |
TAX EFFORT |
|
dc.subject |
TAX EVASION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX EXEMPTION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX EXEMPTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX INSTRUMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX LIABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
TAX ON BUSINESS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX PAYERS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX PAYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
TAX POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
TAX RATE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX RATES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX SHARING |
|
dc.subject |
TAX SHARING ARRANGEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
TAXATION |
|
dc.subject |
TAXPAYER COMPLIANCE |
|
dc.subject |
TAXPAYERS |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL NATIONAL BUDGET |
|
dc.subject |
TOWNS |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSACTION |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPORT |
|
dc.subject |
TURNOVER |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
URBANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
USER CHARGES |
|
dc.subject |
VALUATION |
|
dc.subject |
VALUATION TECHNIQUES |
|
dc.subject |
VALUATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
VEHICLE TAXES |
|
dc.title |
Development of 13 Mozambican
Municipalities in Central and Northern Mozambique : Summary report |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Infrastructure Study |
|
dc.coverage |
Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Southern Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Mozambique |
|