dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:27:03Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T10:27:03Z |
|
dc.date |
2010-09-27 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:45:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:45:33Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20111129233840 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3008 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243357 |
|
dc.description |
This public expenditure review (PER) was
conducted at the request of the Ministry of Finance (MoF) on
behalf of the Government of the Republic of Latvia. The
objective of the PER is to identify potential areas of
further budget savings in public administration and the
social sectors that could help restore fiscal balance, speed
Latvia's recovery from the current crisis, and help it
to meet the Maastricht Criteria by 2012 so it can adopt the
Euro in 2014. The remainder of this volume is structured in
the following way. Section two recounts the events and
circumstances that set the Government's fiscal stance
in the years prior to the crisis. Section three summarizes
the principal emergency measures the Government took to cope
during 2008 and 2009 as the crisis broke and led to
Latvia's severe economic contraction. The purpose of
these sections which draw liberally from material prepared
by the financial authorities, the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the European Central (EC) is to make the case
for further fiscal adjustment plain. The report then
summarizes the main messages and highlights the most
important suggestions made in each of the longer, more
detailed chapters of volume two of the review. Each section
is followed by a matrix of the options presented for the
Government to take into consideration. Given the important
role that municipalities and republican cities play in the
delivery of social services, the chapter three of volume two
provides an in depth examination of local government
finances and spending. Local authorities (municipalities and
republican cities) play such a prominent role in the
delivery of public services particularly social services
that a close look at the character of their spending is critical. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTING |
|
dc.subject |
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
dc.subject |
ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
AMALGAMATION |
|
dc.subject |
ANNUAL AVERAGE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
AUTOMATIC STABILIZERS |
|
dc.subject |
BASELINE SCENARIO |
|
dc.subject |
BENEFICIARIES |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET BALANCE |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET DEFICIT |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET DEFICITS |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET INSTITUTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET PREPARATION |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET PROCESS |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET REDUCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
BUDGET SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL FLIGHT |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL BANK |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL BUDGET |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL CONTROLS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CIVIL SERVANTS |
|
dc.subject |
CIVIL SERVICE |
|
dc.subject |
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMPTION TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
CORPORATE INCOME TAX |
|
dc.subject |
CORPORATE PROFITS |
|
dc.subject |
COST RECOVERY |
|
dc.subject |
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
COST-RECOVERY |
|
dc.subject |
CREDIT GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
CURRENCY |
|
dc.subject |
CYCLICAL SWINGS |
|
dc.subject |
DEBT |
|
dc.subject |
DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
DOMESTIC DEMAND |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC DOWNTURN |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIES OF SCALE |
|
dc.subject |
EDUCATION BUDGET |
|
dc.subject |
EDUCATION POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
EDUCATION PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
EFFICIENCY GAINS |
|
dc.subject |
ELECTRICITY |
|
dc.subject |
EVASION |
|
dc.subject |
EXCHANGE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
EXCHANGE RESERVES |
|
dc.subject |
EXCISE TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE CUTS |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURE POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
EXTERNAL BORROWING |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL CRISIS |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL MARKETS |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL ACCOUNTS |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL ADJUSTMENT |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL BALANCE |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL CONSEQUENCES |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL CONSOLIDATION |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL COST |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL DEFICIT |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL DEFICITS |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL IMBALANCES |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL POSITION |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL SAVINGS |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL STANCE |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL TARGETS |
|
dc.subject |
FOREIGN EXCHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT BUDGET |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT DEFICIT |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT FINANCES |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT |
|
dc.subject |
GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION |
|
dc.subject |
GROWTH RATE |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH CARE |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH OUTCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH PROBLEMS |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
HOSPITAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INFLATION |
|
dc.subject |
INTEREST PAYMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
INTEREST RATE |
|
dc.subject |
INTEREST RATES |
|
dc.subject |
LABOR TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL FINANCING |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGETS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LOTTERY |
|
dc.subject |
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET FAILURES |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET PRICES |
|
dc.subject |
MEDICAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
MEDICAL TREATMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MINISTRY OF CULTURE |
|
dc.subject |
MINISTRY OF FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL HOSPITALS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
NATURAL RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
NET LENDING |
|
dc.subject |
NET SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
OPERATIONAL COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
PAYROLL TAX |
|
dc.subject |
PERSONAL INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
PERSONAL INCOME TAX |
|
dc.subject |
PERSONAL INCOME TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
PERVERSE INCENTIVES |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PROVISION OF SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC DEBT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC GOODS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR SPECIALIST |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC TRANSPORT |
|
dc.subject |
QUALITY OF LIFE |
|
dc.subject |
REAL ESTATE TAX |
|
dc.subject |
RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE |
|
dc.subject |
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RETIREMENT INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE SHARING |
|
dc.subject |
ROADS |
|
dc.subject |
SECTOR PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY FUNCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE LEVELS |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE PROVISION |
|
dc.subject |
SMALL MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL EQUITY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROTECTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL RETURN |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL RETURNS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
STATE AUDIT OFFICE |
|
dc.subject |
STATE BUDGET |
|
dc.subject |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES |
|
dc.subject |
STRUCTURAL DEFICITS |
|
dc.subject |
STRUCTURAL EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
STRUCTURAL REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
STRUCTURAL REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
SUSTAINABLE FISCAL ADJUSTMENT |
|
dc.subject |
TAX ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX BASE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX BURDEN |
|
dc.subject |
TAX CUTS |
|
dc.subject |
TAX POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
TAX RATE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX RATES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
TAX STRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
TAX SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
TAXATION |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL EXPENDITURE |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL SPENDING |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL TAX REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
TREASURY |
|
dc.subject |
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES |
|
dc.title |
Latvia - From Exuberance to Prudence : A Public Expenditure Review of Government Administration and the Social Sectors - Overview and Summary |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure Review |
|
dc.coverage |
Europe and Central Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
Europe and Central Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
Europe |
|
dc.coverage |
Eastern Europe |
|
dc.coverage |
Commonwealth of Independent States |
|
dc.coverage |
Latvia |
|