dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T17:24:31Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T17:24:31Z |
|
dc.date |
2009-05-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:47:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:47:19Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20090902005824 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3101 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243439 |
|
dc.description |
Municipalities in Mozambique were
established by law in 1997 and elected in 1998 for the first
time, only a few years after the peace agreement. Most
inherited archaic and dysfunctional remnants of colonial and
central government systems and infrastructure, and as such
limited progress was achieved in transforming them into
functioning local governments during the first mandate
(1998-2002). During the second mandate (2003-2008), however,
significant improvements were seen as municipalities began
to grasp the nettle of local governance and some service
delivery challenges. By the end of their first decade most
municipalities have reorganized themselves to some extent
and a number have undertaken initiatives that are beginning
to bear fruit. There remains a long way to go, however,
before municipalities will be robust enough to deliver
quality local services to meet growing demand. There is a
danger that the pace of municipal technical and financial
capacity development will be overtaken by the growing
municipal population and by transfers of additional
mandates. Municipalities, central government, and the
Association of Municipalities (ANAMM) need to support
municipalities to perform their potentially significant role
in improving living conditions, stimulating growth and
cementing meaningful democracy in Mozambique. This study
provides the first integrated assessment of the challenges
of local development and service delivery through a
municipal lens. It diagnoses the underlying systemic
constraints facing municipalities, discusses some of the
specific service delivery challenges of the municipalities,
and it sets out recommendations for both central and
municipal governments to tackle some of these constraints
within an integrated and systemic framework. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO LAND |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
ASSETS |
|
dc.subject |
AUTONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
BLOCK GRANTS |
|
dc.subject |
BUSINESS LICENSES |
|
dc.subject |
CADASTRES |
|
dc.subject |
CAPACITY BUILDING |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITAL PROJECTS |
|
dc.subject |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CITIES |
|
dc.subject |
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
CITY CONSULTATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
CIVIL SERVICE |
|
dc.subject |
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMERS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNCILORS |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS |
|
dc.subject |
DECONCENTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRICT GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
ELECTRICITY |
|
dc.subject |
EMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
ENTREPRENEURSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
FISCAL REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
INFORMAL LAND MARKETS |
|
dc.subject |
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS |
|
dc.subject |
INVESTMENT COSTS |
|
dc.subject |
LAND TENURE |
|
dc.subject |
LAND USE |
|
dc.subject |
LARGE CITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LAWS |
|
dc.subject |
LEGISLATION |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL AUTHORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL ENTREPRENEURS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL OPERATORS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
MANDATES |
|
dc.subject |
MAYORS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL BUDGETS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL COMPANIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL COUNCILS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL FINANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL REPRESENTATIVES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL RESPONSIBILITY |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL REVENUE |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL STAFF |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPAL SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
MUNICIPALITY |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
OPERATIONAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
PIT LATRINE |
|
dc.subject |
PIT LATRINES |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE OPERATORS |
|
dc.subject |
PRIVATE SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PROPERTY TAXES |
|
dc.subject |
PROVINCES |
|
dc.subject |
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
PROVINCIAL WATER |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC WORKS |
|
dc.subject |
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
RESOURCE ALLOCATION |
|
dc.subject |
REVENUE COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
ROADS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL TOWNS |
|
dc.subject |
SANITATION FACILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
SANITATION INVESTMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SANITATION OPERATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SANITATION SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SAVINGS |
|
dc.subject |
SEPTIC TANK |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE PROVISION |
|
dc.subject |
SETTLEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
SMALL MUNICIPALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOLID WASTE |
|
dc.subject |
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SPATIAL PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
TAX |
|
dc.subject |
TAX COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
TAX REVENUES |
|
dc.subject |
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE |
|
dc.subject |
TOWNS |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPARENCY |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPORT |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN CENTERS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN ENVIRONMENT |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN GOVERNANCE |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN LAND MANAGEMENT |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN POOR |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN PUBLIC SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN SANITATION |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
URBANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
UTILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
VOTERS |
|
dc.subject |
WATER SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
WATER SUPPLY |
|
dc.subject |
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS |
|
dc.title |
Mozambique - Municipal Development in Mozambique : Lessons from the First Decade - Synthesis Report |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Urban Study |
|
dc.coverage |
Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Southern Africa |
|
dc.coverage |
Mozambique |
|