dc.creator |
World Bank |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T17:25:04Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T17:25:04Z |
|
dc.date |
2009-05-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:47:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:47:44Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20091103030617 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3126 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/243464 |
|
dc.description |
The synthesis report concerns to go
beyond a summary of the country studies to provide lessons
and recommendations on how to further improve Poverty and
Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) effectiveness. To do so, it
draws on findings from country case studies, the literature
and recent internal Bank reviews (World Bank 2006, 2008) on
PSIA. The synthesis is structured in three parts. Section
two reviews the role of PSIA in country work drawing on
internal guidance from the Bank and the wider literature. It
introduces the PSIA framework and the main elements of an
effective PSIA. Section two ends with a presentation of the
review framework and the approach to sampling and
methodology for the country studies. Section three presents
the bulk of the review findings and lessons learned with a
focus on lessons for embedding PSIA into country processes.
Section four addresses the future of PSIA with
recommendations aimed at: (i) improving the influence that
PSIA has on policy and planning processes in-country, and
(ii) ensuring that it is applied more routinely by partner
governments and Bank programs. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
World Bank |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
ALLOCATION |
|
dc.subject |
ALTERNATIVE POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL APPROACH |
|
dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL GAPS |
|
dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL TOOLS |
|
dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL WORK |
|
dc.subject |
CAPACITY BUILDING |
|
dc.subject |
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS |
|
dc.subject |
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
CHOICE OF TOOLS |
|
dc.subject |
CIVIL SOCIETY |
|
dc.subject |
CLIMATE |
|
dc.subject |
CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
COMPENSATION MEASURES |
|
dc.subject |
CONFIDENCE |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMPTION PATTERNS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY CIRCUMSTANCES |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY CONDITIONS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP OF REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY RISKS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY STAKEHOLDERS |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY TEAM |
|
dc.subject |
COUNTRY WORK |
|
dc.subject |
DATA COLLECTION |
|
dc.subject |
DATA LIMITATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
DATA SOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
DIRECT CONSULTATION |
|
dc.subject |
DISCRETION |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
DOMESTIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT NETWORK |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC THEORY |
|
dc.subject |
ENERGY PRICES |
|
dc.subject |
EVALUATION SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL CRISIS |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL SUPPORT |
|
dc.subject |
FOCUS GROUP |
|
dc.subject |
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
FOCUS GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
FUEL PRICES |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
INFORMANT INTERVIEWS |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE |
|
dc.subject |
INSURANCE SCHEMES |
|
dc.subject |
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LEADERSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
M&E |
|
dc.subject |
MACROECONOMIC REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
MEDIA |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL DEBATE |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL POLICY DEBATE |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
OIL PRICE |
|
dc.subject |
OPERATIONAL POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
OPERATIONAL WORK |
|
dc.subject |
PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL |
|
dc.subject |
PENSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY ACTION |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY ADVICE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY AGENDA |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY CHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY CHOICE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY CHOICES |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY CONTEXT |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DEBATE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DECISIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DESIGN |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DIALOGUE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DISCUSSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY FORMULATION |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY IMPLICATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY MAKERS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY MAKING |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY NOTE |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY OPTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY OUTCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY PROCESS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY PROCESSES |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY PURPOSES |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESPONSES |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL ECONOMY RISKS |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL INTERESTS |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL LEADERS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
POOR PEOPLE |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY GROUP |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER |
|
dc.subject |
PRICE INCREASE |
|
dc.subject |
PRICE INCREASES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC DEBATE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
QUALITATIVE DATA |
|
dc.subject |
QUALITATIVE METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
QUANTITATIVE METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM EFFECTIVENESS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM EFFORTS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM PACKAGE |
|
dc.subject |
REFORM PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
SAFETY NETS |
|
dc.subject |
SCENARIOS |
|
dc.subject |
SECTOR WORK |
|
dc.subject |
SERVICE DELIVERY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL EFFECTS OF POLICY REFORM |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL GROUPS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACTS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL PROTECTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT |
|
dc.subject |
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPARENCY |
|
dc.subject |
TRUST FUNDS |
|
dc.subject |
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES |
|
dc.subject |
WATER POLICY |
|
dc.title |
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) : Reviewing the Link with In-Country Policy and Planning Processes - Synthesis Report |
|
dc.type |
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Poverty Study |
|