Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Stakeholder Dialogue as an Institutional Strategy for Sustainable Development in China : The Case of Community Environmental Roundtables

Show simple item record

dc.creator Wang, Hua
dc.date 2012-03-19T18:03:56Z
dc.date 2012-03-19T18:03:56Z
dc.date 2011-08-01
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-17T20:58:26Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-17T20:58:26Z
dc.identifier http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110815113133
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3520
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/244484
dc.description Stakeholder dialogue, as an alternative institutional strategy for environmentally and socially sustainable development, has received little attention from researchers and practitioners in developing countries such as China, even though the dialogue strategy can potentially lead public governance to a more efficient level. This paper first discusses the potential of stakeholder dialogue as an institutional tool for promoting sustainable development in China, and then presents a pilot program of stakeholder dialogue recently developed in China -- the community environmental roundtables. Community leaders organize roundtable dialogues where representatives from government agencies, companies and the local residents exchange their views toward certain environmental issues they are facing and discuss possible ways to resolve the issues. Informal agreements are reached during the dialogues and implemented after them. This community roundtable dialogue strategy has been piloted in dozens of Chinese municipalities, addressing various environmental issues. A survey of dialogue participants shows that significant impacts have been generated on environmental protection, community management, as well as social and institutional development at the community level. Mutual understanding and trust among the government, companies, and local citizens are enhanced, environmental and social conflicts are reduced, and the public performance of various parties has been improved. This approach is expected to help solve other conflicts and public governance issues in China as well. The potential challenges of institutionalizing such a program in China are also discussed in the paper.
dc.language English
dc.relation Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5759
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.rights World Bank
dc.subject ACCESS TO INFORMATION
dc.subject ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
dc.subject AIR POLLUTION
dc.subject AUTHORITY
dc.subject BUDGET SYSTEM
dc.subject BUSINESS COMMUNITY
dc.subject CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject CITIZEN
dc.subject CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
dc.subject CITIZENS
dc.subject CIVIL SOCIETY
dc.subject COAL
dc.subject COMMUNIST
dc.subject COMMUNIST PARTY
dc.subject COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject COMMUNITY GROUPS
dc.subject COMMUNITY LEADERS
dc.subject COMMUNITY LEVEL
dc.subject COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
dc.subject COMMUNITY WORKERS
dc.subject CONSTITUENCY
dc.subject DECISION MAKING
dc.subject DECISION-MAKING
dc.subject DEMOCRACY
dc.subject DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE
dc.subject DISCLOSURE
dc.subject DISTRICTS
dc.subject ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject ECONOMIC GROWTH
dc.subject ECONOMIC INCENTIVES
dc.subject ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS
dc.subject ECONOMIC PROBLEMS
dc.subject ECONOMICS
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
dc.subject ENVIRONMENTS
dc.subject EXECUTION
dc.subject EXTERNALITIES
dc.subject FARMS
dc.subject FINANCIAL SUPPORT
dc.subject FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
dc.subject FISH
dc.subject GOOD GOVERNANCE
dc.subject GOVERNANCE ISSUES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
dc.subject GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT AGENCY
dc.subject GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY
dc.subject GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
dc.subject GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
dc.subject GOVERNMENT POLICIES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES
dc.subject GOVERNMENT SECTOR
dc.subject INCOME
dc.subject INDIGENOUS POLICY
dc.subject INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
dc.subject INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
dc.subject INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject LABOR COSTS
dc.subject LAWS
dc.subject LEGAL DOCUMENTS
dc.subject LEGAL PROVISIONS
dc.subject LIVING STANDARDS
dc.subject LOCAL AUTHORITIES
dc.subject LOCAL COMMUNITY
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
dc.subject LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
dc.subject LOCAL PEOPLE
dc.subject MASS MEDIA
dc.subject MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject MUNICIPALITY
dc.subject NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
dc.subject NATURAL RESOURCES
dc.subject NGO
dc.subject PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
dc.subject PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY
dc.subject POLICY ANALYSIS
dc.subject POLICY DISCUSSIONS
dc.subject POLICY GUIDANCE
dc.subject POLICY INSTRUMENTS
dc.subject POLICY STUDIES
dc.subject POLITICAL LEADERS
dc.subject POLITICAL POWER
dc.subject POLLUTERS
dc.subject POLLUTION
dc.subject POLLUTION ABATEMENT
dc.subject POLLUTION CONTROL
dc.subject POLLUTION REDUCTION
dc.subject PROPAGANDA
dc.subject PUBLIC AFFAIRS
dc.subject PUBLIC AGENCIES
dc.subject PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
dc.subject PUBLIC GOOD
dc.subject PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
dc.subject PUBLIC HEARINGS
dc.subject PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
dc.subject PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
dc.subject PUBLIC OPINIONS
dc.subject PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
dc.subject REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS
dc.subject REGULATORY SYSTEM
dc.subject REPRESENTATIVES
dc.subject RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subject RIVER BASINS
dc.subject SERIES OF MEETINGS
dc.subject SOCIAL CONFLICT
dc.subject SOCIAL IMPACT
dc.subject SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject SOCIAL PROBLEMS
dc.subject SOCIAL STABILITY
dc.subject SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject SOLID WASTES
dc.subject STAKEHOLDER GROUP
dc.subject STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
dc.subject SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject TAX REVENUES
dc.subject WATER POLLUTION
dc.subject WORKING GROUP
dc.title Stakeholder Dialogue as an Institutional Strategy for Sustainable Development in China : The Case of Community Environmental Roundtables
dc.type Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
dc.coverage East Asia and Pacific
dc.coverage East Asia and Pacific
dc.coverage East Asia
dc.coverage Asia
dc.coverage China


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
WPS5759.pdf 692.5Kb application/pdf View/Open
WPS5759.txt 68.33Kb text/plain View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse