dc.creator |
Portner, Claus C. |
|
dc.creator |
Beegle, Kathleen |
|
dc.creator |
Christiaensen, Luc |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T18:04:51Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T18:04:51Z |
|
dc.date |
2011-09-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T20:59:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T20:59:38Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110927132145 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3575 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/244539 |
|
dc.description |
Although reproductive health advocates
consider family planning programs the intervention of choice
to reduce fertility, there remains a great deal of
skepticism among economists as to their effectiveness,
despite little rigorous evidence to support either position.
This study explores the effects of family planning in
Ethiopia using a novel set of instruments to control for
potential non-random program placement. The instruments are
based on ordinal rankings of area characteristics, motivated
by competition between areas for resources. Access to family
planning is found to reduce completed fertility by more than
one child among women without education. No effect is found
among women with some formal schooling, suggesting that
family planning and formal education act as substitutes, at
least in this low-income, low-growth setting. This provides
support to the notion that increasing access to family
planning can provide an important, complementary entry point
to kick-start the process of fertility reduction. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.relation |
Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5812 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ABSTINENCE |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO FAMILY PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
AGED |
|
dc.subject |
AVAILABILITY OF FAMILY PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
AVERAGE AGE |
|
dc.subject |
BIRTH SPACING |
|
dc.subject |
BIRTH WEIGHT |
|
dc.subject |
BREASTFEEDING |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD BEARING |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
CHILDREN PER WOMAN |
|
dc.subject |
CLINICS |
|
dc.subject |
CONCEPTION |
|
dc.subject |
CONDOMS |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATE |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE RATES |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRACEPTIVE USE |
|
dc.subject |
CULTURAL CHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
CURRENT TOTAL FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
DECENTRALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
DECLINE IN FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
DETERMINANTS OF FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMICS |
|
dc.subject |
EDUCATED WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
ETHNIC GROUP |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY ECONOMICS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY FORMATION |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING CLINIC |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING FACILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING METHODS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING SERVICE |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
FEMALE STERILIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY DECLINE |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY PATTERNS |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY RATE |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY RATES |
|
dc.subject |
FEWER BIRTHS |
|
dc.subject |
FOOD INSECURITY |
|
dc.subject |
FORMAL EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
GIRLS |
|
dc.subject |
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH CARE |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH FACILITIES |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH FACILITY |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
HEALTH SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
HIGH FERTILITY RATE |
|
dc.subject |
HIGH POPULATION GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD POVERTY |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSING |
|
dc.subject |
IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
IMPACT OF POPULATION |
|
dc.subject |
IMPACT ON FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
IMPORTANT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
INJECTABLE CONTRACEPTIVES |
|
dc.subject |
INTERVENTION |
|
dc.subject |
IUD |
|
dc.subject |
LABOR MARKET |
|
dc.subject |
LABOUR FORCE |
|
dc.subject |
LACK OF INFORMATION |
|
dc.subject |
LEVELS OF EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
LIFETIME FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
LIMITED RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
LIVE BIRTHS |
|
dc.subject |
LIVING STANDARDS |
|
dc.subject |
LOW INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
LOW-INCOME SETTINGS |
|
dc.subject |
MALARIA |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
METHOD OF CONTRACEPTION |
|
dc.subject |
MIGRATION |
|
dc.subject |
MODERN CONTRACEPTIVES |
|
dc.subject |
MORTALITY LEVELS |
|
dc.subject |
MORTALITY RATE |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL POPULATION |
|
dc.subject |
NATIONAL POPULATION POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
NUMBER OF BIRTHS |
|
dc.subject |
NUMBER OF CHILDREN |
|
dc.subject |
NUMBER OF WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE |
|
dc.subject |
OLDER WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES |
|
dc.subject |
PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL |
|
dc.subject |
PILLS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY DISCUSSIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY IMPLICATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY MAKERS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROWTH RATE |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROWTH RATES |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION SIZE |
|
dc.subject |
PREGNANCIES |
|
dc.subject |
PREGNANCY |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRESS |
|
dc.subject |
REPRODUCTIVE AGE |
|
dc.subject |
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
REPRODUCTIVE LIFE |
|
dc.subject |
REPRODUCTIVE YEARS |
|
dc.subject |
RESOURCE ALLOCATION |
|
dc.subject |
RESPECT |
|
dc.subject |
ROLE OF GENDER |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL COMMUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
SCHOOLS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SECTOR |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL FERTILITY RATE |
|
dc.subject |
TOTAL FERTILITY RATES |
|
dc.subject |
UNWANTED BIRTHS |
|
dc.subject |
UNWANTED FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN COMMUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
URBANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
WOMAN |
|
dc.subject |
WORLD POPULATION |
|
dc.subject |
YOUNG WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
YOUNGER WOMEN |
|
dc.title |
Family Planning and Fertility : Estimating Program Effects Using Cross-Sectional Data |
|
dc.type |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
|
dc.coverage |
The World Region |
|
dc.coverage |
The World Region |
|