dc.creator |
Kuegler, Alice |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T19:08:27Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T19:08:27Z |
|
dc.date |
2009-01-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-17T21:07:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-17T21:07:45Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090121165405 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4019 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/244989 |
|
dc.description |
This paper proposes that individuals
care about the relative income of proximate reference
groups. Making use of self-reported life satisfaction as a
proxy for unobservable utility, the relative income of
siblings is tested for relevance as a reference point for
new sample data from Venezuela. Having greater perceived
income than one's siblings is found to be positively
linked to individual life satisfaction. This evidence
supplements the scarce economic research on reference
groups, supporting the hypothesis that individuals with
proximate characteristics and resembling opportunities in
life serve as points of comparison. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.relation |
Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 4820 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCOUNTING |
|
dc.subject |
ADEQUATE INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
AGGREGATE DEMAND |
|
dc.subject |
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION |
|
dc.subject |
AVERAGE INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
AVERAGE INCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
BASIC NEEDS |
|
dc.subject |
CHECKS |
|
dc.subject |
COMMODITIES |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMER |
|
dc.subject |
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR |
|
dc.subject |
CONTRIBUTION |
|
dc.subject |
DECISION MAKING |
|
dc.subject |
DECREASING FUNCTION |
|
dc.subject |
DEMOCRACY |
|
dc.subject |
DEPENDENT VARIABLE |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMETRIC PROBLEMS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC MODELS |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC RESEARCH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC REVIEW |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC SITUATION |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC THEORY |
|
dc.subject |
EDUCATION PROGRAMS |
|
dc.subject |
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS |
|
dc.subject |
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE |
|
dc.subject |
EMPIRICAL FINDINGS |
|
dc.subject |
EMPIRICAL MODEL |
|
dc.subject |
EMPIRICAL STUDIES |
|
dc.subject |
EQUILIBRIUM LEVEL |
|
dc.subject |
EXPLANATORY VARIABLES |
|
dc.subject |
FINANCIAL SUPPORT |
|
dc.subject |
FUTURE INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD SIZE |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEWIFE |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME DATA |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME EFFECT |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME INCREASES |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME INEQUALITY |
|
dc.subject |
INCOME VARIABLES |
|
dc.subject |
INCOMES |
|
dc.subject |
INFLATION |
|
dc.subject |
JOB LOSS |
|
dc.subject |
LABOR SUPPLY |
|
dc.subject |
LACK OF KNOWLEDGE |
|
dc.subject |
LINEAR RELATIONSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
LITERACY |
|
dc.subject |
LIVING STANDARD |
|
dc.subject |
LIVING STANDARDS |
|
dc.subject |
LOSS AVERSION |
|
dc.subject |
LOW INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
MARGINAL PRODUCTS |
|
dc.subject |
MARKET ECONOMIES |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
MEASUREMENT ERROR |
|
dc.subject |
MEASUREMENT ERRORS |
|
dc.subject |
MEDIAN INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
MEMBER COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
MINIMUM WAGE |
|
dc.subject |
MONTHLY INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
NEGATIVE COEFFICIENT |
|
dc.subject |
NEGATIVE EFFECT |
|
dc.subject |
NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
NEGATIVE SIGN |
|
dc.subject |
OFFICE WORKERS |
|
dc.subject |
OIL PRODUCTION |
|
dc.subject |
PENSIONER |
|
dc.subject |
PER CAPITA INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
PERSONALITY TRAIT |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY IMPLICATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY REVIEW |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL PARTICIPATION |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL STABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE COEFFICIENT |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE EFFECT |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE EFFECTS |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
POVERTY LEVELS |
|
dc.subject |
PROSPERITY |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC ECONOMICS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
QUESTIONNAIRE |
|
dc.subject |
REAL INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
REDISTRIBUTIVE TAXATION |
|
dc.subject |
REGRESSION ANALYSES |
|
dc.subject |
RELATIVE EARNINGS |
|
dc.subject |
RELATIVE INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
RELATIVE POSITION |
|
dc.subject |
RISK SHARING |
|
dc.subject |
RISK SHARING ARRANGEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
SAMPLE SIZE |
|
dc.subject |
SAVINGS |
|
dc.subject |
SECONDARY EDUCATION |
|
dc.subject |
SECONDARY SCHOOL |
|
dc.subject |
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL CAPITAL |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL INDICATORS |
|
dc.subject |
UNEMPLOYED |
|
dc.subject |
UNEMPLOYMENT |
|
dc.subject |
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS |
|
dc.subject |
UTILITY FUNCTION |
|
dc.subject |
UTILITY FUNCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
VOTERS |
|
dc.subject |
WEALTH |
|
dc.title |
A Curse of Comparison? Evidence on Reference Groups for Relative Income Concerns |
|
dc.type |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
|
dc.coverage |
Latin America & Caribbean |
|
dc.coverage |
Latin America & Caribbean |
|
dc.coverage |
The World Region |
|
dc.coverage |
The World Region |
|
dc.coverage |
South America |
|
dc.coverage |
America |
|