dc.creator |
Das Gupta, Monica |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T19:14:20Z |
|
dc.date |
2012-03-19T19:14:20Z |
|
dc.date |
2009-12-01 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-18T19:39:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-18T19:39:07Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20091203173119 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4341 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/249841 |
|
dc.description |
Son preference is known to be found in
certain types of cultures, that is patrilineal cultures. But
what explains the fact that China, South Korea, and
Northwest India manifest such extreme child sex ratios
compared with other patrilineal societies? This paper argues
that what makes these societies unique is that their
pre-modern political and administrative systems used
patrilineages to organize and administer their citizens. The
interplay of culture, state, and political processes
generated uniquely rigid patriliny and son preference. The
paper also argues that the advent of the modern state in
these settings has unraveled the underpinnings of the rigid
patrilineal rules, and unleashed a variety of forces that
reduce son preference. Firstly, the modern state has
powerful tools for incorporating and managing its citizenry,
rendering patrilineages a threat rather than an asset for
the state. Secondly, the modern state has brought in
political, social, and legal reforms aimed to challenge
traditional social hierarchies, including the age and gender
hierarchies of the kinship system. Thirdly,
industrialization and urbanization have ushered in new modes
of social organization, which reduce the hold of clans and
lineages. Studies of the impact of the media suggest that
states can accelerate the resultant decline in son
preference, through media efforts to help parents perceive
that daughters can now be as valuable as sons. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.relation |
Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5148 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO |
|
dc.rights |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ |
|
dc.rights |
World Bank |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO LAND |
|
dc.subject |
ACCESS TO RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
ADULT WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
ADULTS |
|
dc.subject |
AFTERLIFE |
|
dc.subject |
AGED |
|
dc.subject |
ALLIANCES |
|
dc.subject |
AUTONOMY |
|
dc.subject |
BIRTH ORDER |
|
dc.subject |
BREADWINNER |
|
dc.subject |
CAPITALISM |
|
dc.subject |
CENSUSES |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD CUSTODY |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD MARRIAGE |
|
dc.subject |
CHILD MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
CHILDBEARING |
|
dc.subject |
CITIES |
|
dc.subject |
CITIZENS |
|
dc.subject |
CIVILIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
CLAN |
|
dc.subject |
COMMON PROPERTY |
|
dc.subject |
COURT |
|
dc.subject |
COURTS |
|
dc.subject |
CULTURES |
|
dc.subject |
CUSTOMARY LAW |
|
dc.subject |
CUSTOMARY PRACTICE |
|
dc.subject |
DAILY LIFE |
|
dc.subject |
DEMOCRACY |
|
dc.subject |
DEMOGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
DEMOGRAPHY |
|
dc.subject |
DESCENT |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
DIFFERENTIALS IN MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
DISCOURSE |
|
dc.subject |
DISCRIMINATION |
|
dc.subject |
DIVISION OF PROPERTY |
|
dc.subject |
DIVORCE |
|
dc.subject |
DIVORCED WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
DOMESTIC SPHERE |
|
dc.subject |
DOWRIES |
|
dc.subject |
DOWRY |
|
dc.subject |
EARLY CHILDHOOD |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC RESOURCES |
|
dc.subject |
ECONOMIC RIGHTS |
|
dc.subject |
EITHER SEX |
|
dc.subject |
ELDERLY |
|
dc.subject |
ELDERLY WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
ENDOGAMY |
|
dc.subject |
EQUAL RIGHTS |
|
dc.subject |
EQUALITY OF MEN |
|
dc.subject |
ETHNIC IDENTITY |
|
dc.subject |
ETHNICITY |
|
dc.subject |
ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDIES |
|
dc.subject |
ETHNOGRAPHIES |
|
dc.subject |
EXCESS MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILIES |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY COMPOSITION |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY FORMS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY HEALTH |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY INCOME |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY LAW |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY LAWS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY MEMBERS |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY PLANNING |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY SIZE |
|
dc.subject |
FAMILY STRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
FATHERS |
|
dc.subject |
FEMALE |
|
dc.subject |
FEMALE INFANTICIDE |
|
dc.subject |
FEMALE MORTALITY |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY |
|
dc.subject |
FERTILITY DECLINE |
|
dc.subject |
FOLKLORE |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER BIAS |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER DIFFERENCES |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER DISCRIMINATION |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER EQUALITY |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER EQUITY |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER HIERARCHIES |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER INEQUITIES |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER PREFERENCE |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER RELATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
GENDER ROLES |
|
dc.subject |
GENEALOGY |
|
dc.subject |
GENERATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
HEAD OF THE FAMILY |
|
dc.subject |
HOME |
|
dc.subject |
HOMES |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLDS |
|
dc.subject |
HOUSES |
|
dc.subject |
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
HUNTING |
|
dc.subject |
HUSBAND |
|
dc.subject |
HUSBANDS |
|
dc.subject |
ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN |
|
dc.subject |
ILLNESS |
|
dc.subject |
IMAGES OF WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
IMMIGRANTS |
|
dc.subject |
INCEST |
|
dc.subject |
INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS |
|
dc.subject |
INDUSTRIALIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
INEQUALITIES |
|
dc.subject |
INFANT |
|
dc.subject |
INHERITANCE |
|
dc.subject |
ISLAMIC LAW |
|
dc.subject |
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE |
|
dc.subject |
JOURNAL OF WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
KINSHIP |
|
dc.subject |
KINSHIP STRUCTURE |
|
dc.subject |
LAWS |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL CHANGES |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL ENTITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL REFORMS |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL RIGHTS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL COMMUNITIES |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL POPULATION |
|
dc.subject |
LOCAL POPULATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIAGE LAW |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIAGES |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED COUPLES |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED MEN |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED WOMAN |
|
dc.subject |
MARRIED WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
MASS MEDIA |
|
dc.subject |
MEDICAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
MIGRATION |
|
dc.subject |
MODERNIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
MORTALITY AMONG INFANTS |
|
dc.subject |
MOTHER |
|
dc.subject |
MURDERS OF WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
NUMBER OF GIRLS |
|
dc.subject |
OFFENDERS |
|
dc.subject |
OLD AGE |
|
dc.subject |
OLD SYSTEM |
|
dc.subject |
PARENTHOOD |
|
dc.subject |
PARENTS |
|
dc.subject |
PATRIARCHY |
|
dc.subject |
PEACE |
|
dc.subject |
PENSION |
|
dc.subject |
PERSONAL LIVES |
|
dc.subject |
PHILOSOPHY |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH |
|
dc.subject |
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL INSTABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL POWER |
|
dc.subject |
POLITICAL SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
POLYANDRY |
|
dc.subject |
POPULAR CULTURE |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION CENSUSES |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION DIVISION |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION GROWTH |
|
dc.subject |
POPULATION STUDIES |
|
dc.subject |
PREFERENCE FOR SONS |
|
dc.subject |
PRENATAL SEX SELECTION |
|
dc.subject |
PROGRESS |
|
dc.subject |
PROPERTY RIGHTS |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC LIFE |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC POLICY |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
PUBLIC SPHERE |
|
dc.subject |
RADIO |
|
dc.subject |
RELIGION |
|
dc.subject |
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS |
|
dc.subject |
RESIDENCE |
|
dc.subject |
RIGHT OF REFUSAL |
|
dc.subject |
RITES |
|
dc.subject |
RITUAL |
|
dc.subject |
RITUALS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
|
dc.subject |
RURAL WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
SANCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
SEX |
|
dc.subject |
SEX DIFFERENCES |
|
dc.subject |
SEX OF THE CHILD |
|
dc.subject |
SEX PREFERENCE |
|
dc.subject |
SEX RATIO |
|
dc.subject |
SEX RATIOS |
|
dc.subject |
SEX-SELECTIVE ABORTION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL AFFAIRS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL CHANGE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL CLASS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL CONTROL |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL MOVEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL NORMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL ORGANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SCIENCE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SERVICES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL STATUS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SUPPORT |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL SYSTEMS |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIAL WELFARE |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIETIES |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIETY |
|
dc.subject |
SOCIOLOGY |
|
dc.subject |
SON PREFERENCE |
|
dc.subject |
STATE POLICIES |
|
dc.subject |
SYMBOLS |
|
dc.subject |
TELEVISION |
|
dc.subject |
TRANSPORTATION |
|
dc.subject |
TV |
|
dc.subject |
UNITED NATIONS |
|
dc.subject |
UNMARRIED WOMAN |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN AREAS |
|
dc.subject |
URBAN WOMEN |
|
dc.subject |
URBANIZATION |
|
dc.subject |
VILLAGES |
|
dc.subject |
WAR |
|
dc.subject |
WARS |
|
dc.subject |
WIFE |
|
dc.subject |
WILL |
|
dc.subject |
WIVES |
|
dc.subject |
WOMAN |
|
dc.subject |
WOMEN'S STATUS |
|
dc.subject |
WORLD POPULATION |
|
dc.subject |
YOUNG COUPLE |
|
dc.subject |
YOUNG GIRLS |
|
dc.subject |
YOUNG WOMEN |
|
dc.title |
Family Systems, Political systems, and Asia’s ‘Missing Girls’ : The Construction of Son Preference and Its Unraveling |
|
dc.type |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
|
dc.type |
Publications & Research |
|
dc.coverage |
South Asia |
|
dc.coverage |
The World Region |
|
dc.coverage |
East Asia and Pacific |
|