Show simple item record

dc.creator Barr, Donald A.
dc.date 2022-07-15T15:12:41Z
dc.date 2022-07-15T15:12:41Z
dc.date 2010
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-20T15:21:19Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-20T15:21:19Z
dc.identifier ONIX_20220715_9781421427935_491
dc.identifier https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88744
dc.identifier https://muse.jhu.edu/book/462
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/251669
dc.description This book raises fundamental questions about the propriety of continuing to use a premedical curriculum developed more than a century ago to select students for training as future physicians for the twenty-first century. In it, Dr. Donald A. Barr examines the historical origins, evolution, and current state of premedical education in the United States. One hundred years ago, Abraham Flexner's report on Medical Education in the United States and Canada helped establish the modern paradigm of premedical and medical education. Barr’s research finds the system of premedical education that evolved to be a poor predictor of subsequent clinical competency and professional excellence, while simultaneously discouraging many students from underrepresented minority groups or economically disadvantaged backgrounds from pursuing a career as a physician. Analyzing more than fifty years of research, Barr shows that many of the best prospects are not being admitted to medical schools, with long-term adverse consequences for the U.S. medical profession. The root of the problem, Barr argues, is the premedical curriculum—which overemphasizes biology, chemistry, and physics by teaching them as separate, discrete subjects. In proposing a fundamental restructuring of premedical education, Barr makes the case for parallel tracks of undergraduate science education: one that would largely retain the current system; and a second that would integrate the life sciences in a problem-based, collaborative learning pedagogy. Barr argues that the new, integrated curriculum will encourage greater educational and social diversity among premedical candidates without weakening the quality of the education. He includes an evaluative research framework to judge the outcome of such a restructured system.This historical and cultural analysis of premedical education in the United States is the crucial first step in questioning the appropriateness of continuing a hundred-year-old, empirically dubious pedagogical model for the twenty-first century.
dc.format image/jpeg
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
dc.rights open access
dc.subject Higher & further education, tertiary education
dc.subject bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JN Education::JNM Higher & further education, tertiary education
dc.title Questioning the Premedical Paradigm
dc.resourceType book
dc.alternateIdentifier 9781421427935
dc.alternateIdentifier 10.1353/book.462
dc.licenseCondition Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.identifierdoi 10.1353/book.462
dc.relationisPublishedBy 1f9b1002-ec35-4fcf-94be-32cfd0a1dfd3
dc.relationisbn 9781421427935
dc.pages 240


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
9781421427935.jpg 78.45Kb image/jpeg View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) [5044]
    DOAB is a discovery service for peer reviewed open access books and book publishers that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed books.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse