Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

War, Myth, Memory: Tolstoy's Diachronic Reception of Homer

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Maguire, Muireann
dc.contributor Hauser, Emily
dc.creator Yefimenko, S
dc.date 2023-01-03T11:22:07Z
dc.date 2022-10-03
dc.date 2022-12-31T18:56:47Z
dc.date 2023-01-03T11:22:07Z
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-23T12:18:57Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-23T12:18:57Z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10871/132117
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/258745
dc.description This thesis examines Lev Tolstoy’s diachronic reception of Homeric epic poetry. Situated in the field of classical reception in nineteenth century Russian literature, it argues that Tolstoy’s writing initially celebrated the Homeric notion of heroism by adapting it to a nationalistic discourse; then transitioned to problematizing traditional epic heroism in Tolstoy’s middle period by means of a historiographical critique; and culminated in a reconciliation with heroic epic in Tolstoy’s later work by spiritualizing the category of Homeric poetry. By applying a Nietzschean reading to Tolstoy’s published and unpublished material, this study contends that Tolstoy’s historiographical approach was essentially nihilistic, a position which prompted Tolstoy’s creation of the radical intellectual category istoriia-iskusstvo, or history-art. I show how this historical-aesthetic orientation provided a theoretical justification for Tolstoy’s deliberate manipulation of Homer’s poetry and identity. An investigation of how Tolstoy appropriated, adapted, and reconfigured elements of Homeric material in his writing, from some of his earliest short stories, ‘The Raid’ and ‘The Woodfelling’, to his final significant work of fiction, Hadji Murat, sheds light on how Homer’s poetry served Tolstoy not only as an aesthetic model, but as an ethical, historiographical, and spiritual reference point. In doing so, this thesis explains Tolstoy’s constantly shifting literary and intellectual projects and concerns from the perspective of his commitment to traditional heroic epic, which remained constant throughout his writing career. Finally, I demonstrate how Tolstoy developed, legitimized, and canonized his own version of Russia’s cultural identity, collective memory, sociopolitical values, and religious faith, by drawing on Homer’s poetry. I will contextualize Tolstoy’s reception of Homeric material in relation to the Crimean War, the social responsibility of artistic and historical disciplines, and the empire’s expansion into the Caucasus.
dc.publisher University of Exeter
dc.publisher Modern Languages and Cultures
dc.rights 2023-12-01
dc.rights Intend to submit for publication an article from material in Chapter Five.
dc.rights http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subject Classical reception
dc.subject Tolstoy
dc.subject Homer
dc.subject Russian Studies
dc.subject 19th Century Russian Literature
dc.subject Epic Poetry
dc.title War, Myth, Memory: Tolstoy's Diachronic Reception of Homer
dc.type Thesis or dissertation
dc.type PhD in Russian Studies
dc.type Doctoral
dc.type Doctoral Thesis


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
YefimenkoS.pdf 2.469Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse