Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Seasonal Unit Root Tests: A Comparison

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Denis Pelletier, Committee Member
dc.contributor Peter Bloomfield, Committee Member
dc.contributor Sastry G. Pantula, Committee Co-Chair
dc.contributor David A. Dickey, Committee Co-Chair
dc.creator Zhang, Qianyi
dc.date 2010-04-02T18:57:54Z
dc.date 2010-04-02T18:57:54Z
dc.date 2008-10-26
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-28T17:07:11Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-28T17:07:11Z
dc.identifier etd-07072008-143453
dc.identifier http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4634
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/265508
dc.description Three major regression-based seasonal unit root tests: the DHF test introduced by Dickey et al (1984), the HEGY test proposed by Hylleberg et al. (1990) and the Kunst test introduced by Kunst (1997) are compared. The regression model for the DHF test is a reduced form of that for the Kunst test. We modify the Kunst test by using the t-statistic instead of Kunst's proposed joint F-statistic to study the influence of additional variables in the Kunst model. Also, we modify the HEGY test to test the presence of all four quarterly unit roots against the presence of roots 1 and -1. Through the comparison between the DHF test and the modified HEGY test, we find that the DHF test does not have asymptotic power one when the series only have some of the seasonal unit roots but not all of them. We call this case of partial unit roots. The asymptotic distributions derived in the paper provide the explanation of this limitation for the DHF test. Using simulation, we find that the probability that the DHF test will lead researchers to accept the seasonal unit root null hypothesis increases when the series contains more partial unit roots. For the DHF test, the test power depends on the augmented model. We derive limits of the related estimates from two augmented models for the DHF test. Both estimates are inconsistent. The test statistic obtained from the augmented model suggested by Ghysels et al. (1992) has relatively low power. For the HEGY/Kunst test, most limiting distributions for the test statistics depend on the lag augmentation but the test statistics have few problems caused by inconsistent estimates. However, the augmented models for the HEGY/Kunst test have more variables than those for the DHF test. Based on our simulation study results, the inclusion of more variables results in more loss in power when a redundant variable is included, and more sensitivity to the size distortion when the augmented lag length is less than the true lag length.
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
dc.subject Power
dc.subject Seasonal Unit Roots
dc.title Seasonal Unit Root Tests: A Comparison


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 3.948Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse