Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

Development of a Co-participatory and Reflexive Approach to Teaching and Learning Instructional Design

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Teaching and Learning
dc.contributor Magliaro, Susan G.
dc.contributor Sherman, Thomas M.
dc.contributor Holmes, Glen A.
dc.contributor Moore, David M.
dc.contributor Doolittle, Peter E.
dc.contributor Niles, Jerome A.
dc.creator Shambaugh, Roy Neal
dc.date 2014-03-14T20:07:11Z
dc.date 2014-03-14T20:07:11Z
dc.date 1999-02-02
dc.date 1999-02-05
dc.date 2000-06-02
dc.date 1999-02-05
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-28T18:22:08Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-28T18:22:08Z
dc.identifier etd-020599-094356
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26130
dc.identifier http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-020599-094356/
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/269784
dc.description While there are numerous models to practice instructional design, few instructional models to teach instructional design have been documented. This dissertation documents the development of a reflexive teaching model for the teaching of instructional design (ID) in a graduate education program. The model supports co-participatory learning of instructional design and mutual examination of one's learning and participation by both instructor and students. A design and development framework is used to describe the design decisions, model implementation, and evaluation of the model across six deliveries, or case studies, of a master's level instructional design course from 1994-1998. Design decisions included course sequence, learning tasks, instructional materials, and assessment rubric. Model implementation described student responses to instruction and instructor efforts to assist learners. The model was evaluated in terms of student performance on instructional design projects, student perceptions of their learning, and instructor responsivity to learner needs. The model's development was summarized in terms of changes in design decisions, model implementation, and model evaluation over the six cases. A discussion of the reflexive model is presented using Joyce and Weil's (1996) conceptual approach, describing the model's social system, syntax, participants' reaction, support system, plus the model's instructional and nurturant effects. Four categories of conclusions address improvements to the instructional approach, conditions that promote successful use of the model, impact of the model on student and teacher learning, and conditions conducive to efficient model development. Limitations of the study, future research options, and the implications of the model for ID instruction, the ID process, and teacher inquiry are discussed.
dc.description Ph. D.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.publisher Virginia Tech
dc.relation Ch1-2.pdf
dc.relation Ch3.pdf
dc.relation App.pdf
dc.relation Ref.pdf
dc.relation Ch6.pdf
dc.relation Ch5.pdf
dc.relation Ch-0.pdf
dc.relation Ch4.pdf
dc.rights In Copyright
dc.rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject developmental research
dc.subject case study
dc.subject teaching model
dc.subject instructional design
dc.title Development of a Co-participatory and Reflexive Approach to Teaching and Learning Instructional Design
dc.type Dissertation


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
App.pdf 254.2Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch-0.pdf 26.27Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch1-2.pdf 119.8Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch3.pdf 123.1Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch4.pdf 339.0Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch5.pdf 76.66Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ch6.pdf 40.84Kb application/pdf View/Open
Ref.pdf 49.55Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse