Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

An analysis of the laws affecting North Carolina public school teachers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Educational Administration
dc.creator Scott, Gilda Cox
dc.date 2014-08-13T14:38:42Z
dc.date 2014-08-13T14:38:42Z
dc.date 1987
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-28T18:22:11Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-28T18:22:11Z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10919/49890
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/269788
dc.description This study has provided an up-to-date source of information for North Carolina public school teachers to help them understand the sources of school law, the legal basis for education, the system of state and federal courts, and their rights and responsibilities. Appropriate federal and state judicial decisions, federal and state constitutional law, state statutes, State Board of Education policies, and the opinions of the Attorney General have been analyzed to determine legal principles in the following areas: 1. constitutional rights of teachers as a public school employee and a private citizen which included the areas of freedom of speech and expression; academic freedom, freedom of religion; private life; personal appearance; loyalty; 2. terms and conditions of employment which included certification, tenure, teacher's duties, due process for tenured teachers, procedural rights for nontenured teachers, dismissal for cause; and the 3. teacher's liability for students. Tort liability included strict liability; the intentional torts of assault and battery, defamation, and false imprisonment; the unintentional tort of negligence and its elements and defenses; educational malpractice; governmental immunity; and students' records. Of particular concern were assault and battery and child abuse cases as related to corporal punishment, the use of qualified privilege as a defense in defamation, and the option provided by the legislature for school boards to waive governmental immunity. North Carolina courts have determined that the fundamental principle of negligence cases in North Carolina is foreseeability of harm. As a result of this study, it has been recommended that the study be updated on an ongoing basis to maintain an up-to-date source of legal information for North Carolina teachers. ln addition, a similar study has been recommended for other states. lt was further recommended that a study examine the developing case law in educational malpractice along with state legal restrictions which interfere with good educational practices.
dc.description Ed. D.
dc.description incomplete_metadata
dc.format ix, 332 leaves
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
dc.relation OCLC# 17792623
dc.rights In Copyright
dc.rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject LD5655.V856 1987.S367
dc.subject Teachers -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- North Carolina
dc.title An analysis of the laws affecting North Carolina public school teachers
dc.type Dissertation
dc.type Text


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
LD5655.V856_1987.S367.pdf 9.998Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse