Sangam: A Confluence of Knowledge Streams

The Presidential Library System: A Quiescent Policy Subsystem

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Public Administration and Public Affairs
dc.contributor Wolf, James F.
dc.contributor Rohr, John A.
dc.contributor White, Orion F. Jr.
dc.contributor Wamsley, Gary L.
dc.contributor Aversa, Elizabeth S.
dc.creator Cochrane, Lynn Scott
dc.date 2014-03-14T20:21:07Z
dc.date 2014-03-14T20:21:07Z
dc.date 1998-12-14
dc.date 1998-12-22
dc.date 1999-01-06
dc.date 1999-01-06
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-01T08:10:20Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-01T08:10:20Z
dc.identifier etd-122298-171101
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30242
dc.identifier http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-122298-171101/
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/CUHPOERS/276602
dc.description This study examines the Presidential Library System, an agency within the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), as an example of a policy subsystem. A policy subsystem may be defined as an informal political coalition of individuals from different parts of a formal policy structure who cooperate to influence policy-making. Actors in a policy subsystem are multifarious, they span both public and private sectors at various levels of government, and may include agency personnel, congressional committee members, interest group participants, citizens of localities affected by the subsystem, and others. A policy subsystem's strength lies in its ability to draw upon bureaucratic expertise, legislative leverage, and interest-group capacities to communicate with the government about the area of public policy it is vitally concerned with. Despite the 60 year existence of the Presidential Library System, its nationwide geographic distribution, and its approximately $30 million/year allocation from the federal budget, it is not widely recognized as a policy system and it has not been the subject of a detailed, scholarly description. The Presidential Libraries policy subsystem is described by tracing its development and mapping the richness of the administrative and political processes which support its continuing viability. The specific research questions addressed are:1) how do the administrative and political processes of this policy subsystem unfold, 2) how do these processes provide system maintenance, and 3) who are the players? Qualitative research techniques, via a case study methodology, were used to address these questions.. In-depth interviews were conducted with the directors of the ten Presidential Libraries, the staff of the Office of Presidential Libraries at NARA, and key stakeholders in the system. Questions addressed included: what do all of the presidential libraries share?, what is unique about each?, to what extent IS the Presidential Library System a policy subsystem?, and how is government organized to deal with presidential libraries and their mission of 1) preserving and providing researchers access to presidential papers and historical materials, and 2) providing museums and educational programming designed to give the general public a better understanding of the individual Presidents, the institution of the Presidency, and the American political system as a whole?
dc.description Ph. D.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.publisher Virginia Tech
dc.relation ADDENDUM.PDF
dc.relation dissertation2.pdf
dc.rights In Copyright
dc.rights http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject policy subsystems
dc.subject presidential libraries
dc.title The Presidential Library System: A Quiescent Policy Subsystem
dc.type Dissertation


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ADDENDUM.PDF 1.012Mb application/pdf View/Open
dissertation2.pdf 1.012Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse